Comments on: Ensign Crusher (Wil Wheaton) Thinks Star Trek XI will SUCK

By: D. Phillips

D. Phillips — Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:30:07 +0000

And it did.

By: Assunta

Assunta — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:52:58 +0000

Hi,

I just watched this too (well, halfway through it so far). I didn’t watch when it came out coz I knew it might suck. I was right. Glad I didn’t waste money on this thing (the DVD I’m watching is from the local library…FREE of Charge). JJ “Retard” Abrams completely dumbed down Star Trek into just another summer blockbuster to appeal to the mass of young moviegoers who just like to watch cool ‘splosions’n boobies and don’t give crap about a good plot. The “science” in “science fiction” is gone. Gone is Roddenberry’s vision. I mean a supernova that threatens the “entire galaxy”? Hello? And that particular line spoken by legendary science officer Spock himself? Uh Hello? A total insult to INTELLIGENT trekkies and intelligent moviegoers in general. Ripping off the iceworld scene from Star Wars? WTF? JJ RETARD Abrams ruined this movie. Oh I know it made money coz of the fancy flashy (but shallow and meaningless) action scenes and ‘splotions’and the baring of young and hot Uhura & Orion flesh. Thats all that seems to matter to today’s moviegoing generation…just blow sh#t up and show some skin. Total Disappointment!

By: Ene

Ene — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:06:56 +0000

What has this abomination to do with Star Trek anyway? just labelling any action movie set in the future “Trek” doesn’t do the trick. I just watched the movie for the first time – procrastinating because I thought it would be bad… but it was worse. Skip canon, skip continuity, skip the visionary background that has made Trek what it was… Great job.
Do what feels right or some such crap is the message? Thanks a lot. When I watched Star Trek, it was “Use your brains, reason is a good thing”. And that’s without discussing the annoying intro – pathos, drama, babys. Urgh. The abundance of promotions and commissions given out to cadets… timeline and continuity mistakes… The Vulcan Science Academy builds an armed vessel? Oh come on, anyone remember the USS Intrepid? Did I miss the Vulcans going on the warpath? There’s basically no end to reasons why this movie called Star Trek is a moderately funny action movie – but absolute crap when considered by Trek-Standards.

By: eber3

eber3 — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:26:20 +0000

It was a horrible scifi movie. All it really was was a fast paced action based summer blockbuster. It was Independence Day without as good of a story, acting, etc. Difference being ID didn’t have to destroy a true scifi classic in order to put its garbage on screen.

By: Tom Baker

Tom Baker — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:27:16 +0000

It was not Star Trek the way I wanted and perhaps it will be better in Star Trek IV, but it was a better sci fi movie than has been put out by studios of late.

By: eber3

eber3 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:28:03 +0000

Lol. Either Vader Trek’s post is in jest, or it is a perfect example of why this movie sucks. It was made for people who really do think like this.

By: Vader Trek

Vader Trek — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:51:50 +0000

I must say I absolutely loved the movie. J.J. Abrams really revolutionalized Star Trek… he eliminated the need for Star Ships, for a more efficient way of transportation: Beaming. From a modernist view I think its great.. ships becoming obsolete and being replaced with mordern technology. Imagine in Voyagers time during the new time line…. just imagine how many planets away you ll be able to beam 2….

Furthermore he added what Star Trek was missing… the Star Wars element.. you now have the little aliens… Scotty’s friend… it is the Jawa… and then you got the skinny aliens… those that sing in the movies…you know the background aliens… Go J.J.

By: James Spock

James Spock — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:02:10 +0000

It was just a brainless action movie, science is all wrong, dosen’t feel like I was watching StarTrek, (More like Star Wars)

By: Stan

Stan — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:35:19 +0000

much hate on this movie. I thought it was great. Plot holes yes but it was actually exciting in way the latest trek films and tv shows haven’t been. Not every plot has to center around a technobable or philosophy. Sometimes blowing sh*t up is fun. No mater what you think of the story or direction I think the acting was great Zach made a awesome spock and the SFX top notch.

By: trekhaus

trekhaus — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:29:39 +0000

the movie is shit agree on that… but it is´n like back to the future. When time is changed a new timeline is created… it does not erase the future. We saw in many episodes the mirror caracters and ships… so with that in mind the bastards can do any shit they like… hell they might even bring back f*king x-men. They can say it is a more violent universe… it would be cooler to see a movie in the original mirror universe. Startrek 11 is not startrek is for mindless starwars fans all over the world.

By: Dj Bombero

Dj Bombero — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:44:17 +0000

This movie made me BOLDLY GO… GO VOMIT AND SH*T my HEART OUT…

IT SUCKED KLINGON DONKEY BALLS!!!

If you come from the future and your PAST has been Changed… HOW DO REMEMBER your ORIGINAL TIME-LINE HISTORY!?!? A lot of HOLES.. BLACK HOLES and A**HOLES! My dead mother could have wrote a better script..

WHY DO THEY STILL USE PARACHUTES? BECAUSE ITS IN THE SCRIPT AND IT LOOKS COOL…

ABRAHMS… GO SLIT YOUR WRIST in a TUB of WARM WATER!

BAAAARRRFFFFFFF!!!!

By: Pete Sikorsky

Pete Sikorsky — Sun, 31 May 2009 07:52:38 +0000

Oh and there were a lot of ranks given for the one mission…

By: Pete Sikorsky

Pete Sikorsky — Sun, 31 May 2009 07:50:43 +0000

I was entertained by this movie, but it was not Star Trek. Vulcans do not want to acknowledge emotion. Kirk’s defeat of the Kobayashi-Maru scenario was too cavalier. Uhuru doesn’t “go” with Spock. The abandonment of Logic that is encouraged seems to be an endorsement of the peanut gallery in congress and the white house. “hope, change.” There is no deep philosophical quandary like the next generation. Little compelling character development, beyond young Kirk. To long time star trek fans this should seem like a sell out to the ‘hopeful” contemporary ideology.

By: Fred M

Fred M — Wed, 27 May 2009 09:15:07 +0000

Star Trek XI was garbage. I honestly wanted to walk out 30 minutes in, but stayed because I paid good money and because I couldn’t rightfully complain about what a galaxy sized abomination it was unless I did see it reel to reel.
I honestly feel sorry for those Trekkies and Trekkers that are so hungry for Trek product (any product) that they gladly sing the praises of this waste of film, which no doubt would have Gene spinning in his grave if he rested within one.
Thank God I have all my old Trek paperbacks and DVDs. I have a feeling it’s going to be one long, very cold winter for true Trek fans everywhere.

By: Bo

Bo — Fri, 22 May 2009 20:11:21 +0000

Thank goodness I am not the only one who thought this movie was a pile of crap. I should have known because everything JJ Abrams does is loaf. What is all the hype around JJ Abrams anyway? I feel like such a sucker, he got me again. First, he got me with Alias which turned to crap; then, he got me with Lost which also turned to crap and now this…

I won’t even go into details about how stupid this movie was. The honest critics have already said it and the people who can think for themselves know it sucked big time. Can I get that two hours of my life back…???

By: Upset nerd

Upset nerd — Thu, 21 May 2009 17:19:14 +0000

This movie not only insults trekkies and viewer alike, but it also defys physics. If Spock was able to save Romulus and collapse the star, the planet surface would freeze in absolute zero from there being no energy source and would almost instantly kill all the Romulans. But in this case apperently J. J. Abrams 1 – Thermodynamics 0.

By: MAD TREK EEE

MAD TREK EEE — Sun, 17 May 2009 03:27:46 +0000

Where do I begin? I just saw this so called “Star Trek” movie. Will the real Trekkies (Like myself) stand up and protest this abomination?! Not knocking the effects and cast; All Ok. The story line is so “Been there–done that–”. How long are you gonna play this “going back in time” idea. It was done in Star Trek 4( Voyage Home) and done again in Star Trek “First Contact”. They should have relabeled the title “Star Trek– WE RAN OUT OF IDEAS AND MONEY SO WE THOUGHT YOU’D LIKE THIS”. There are so many inconsistencies I lost track. When did Uhura have a relationship with Spock? Did I miss that original episode? Star Trek gave people a sense of inspiration and hope for the future. This movie said to me after it thankfully ended–”Ha–we used the Star Trek name to bring you in and take your money. Watch Transformers and GI JOE so that we can kick you in the balls again?! This movie took Gene Roddenberry’s storyline and %$^*#$ all over it!!! They can’t even get the theme music right. Oh yeah, they finally play the original theme music after everyone is getting up and leaving the movie theater…DISGUSTING and DISAPPOINTING!! And what is up with Leonard Nemoy’s Cameo? Is this suppose to be an apology to the real Trekkies in the theater to tell them–”Hey we’re sorry we made a bad movie, but here’s someone that you know to make it all better…” Hollywood strikes again—Recreating and reinventing something that needs none of either. Lots of potential to make a really good movie.

By: David

David — Sun, 10 May 2009 03:41:23 +0000

I saw Star Trek. It was terrible.

By: KevinQC

KevinQC — Thu, 07 May 2009 02:19:33 +0000

The movie is gonna suck

By: Friedebarth

Friedebarth — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:12:54 +0000

Wil Wheaton’s right. I mean, what’s next? Star Trek: Friends? Star Trek: Terminator? CSI: Star Trek? Star Trek and the Director’s Screenplay? Lord of the Treks?

And Wesley Crusher was a cool character.

And Abrams is just as good a director as a wet sponge. Go cry in your Vader costume, JJ!

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:14:17 +0000

Lets face it… Gene Rodenberry is rolling in his grave. His body wasn’t even cold yet when Majel starting whoring out Trek lock stock and phaser. So what we have coming now is nothing less than 90210 in space. I think I’m gonna hurl. Would somebody please shoot me befre the #!*%#! muppet version comes out.

By: Will Killyou

Will Killyou — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:53:45 +0000

” hello! LOST!! CLOVERFIELD!!” HELLO? HELLO? I am stupid AMERICAN HELLO! HELLO! Lost and cloverfield both suck!!!

I don’t like JJ Abrahms and basically I think he sucks. He is obviously making movies because he is part of a nepotistic degenerate crowd that is so prevalent in the Entertainment Industry. I loved mission impossible the series and he ruined it. I liked Star Trek (original) and he will ruin that too. He has no talent and survives only because of the degenerate virtually illiterate population that exists in the United States at this time. JJ Abrahms is a perfect reflection of such a society and thus many of you like his work. Just look at JJ’s ugly face that says it all!

By: Averre

Averre — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:22:34 +0000

Vince, if you think Enterprise was good then you simply do not know Star Trek at all, Trekkies didn’t ruin the show…it ruined itself…lame storytelling, lame actors and a totally idiotic/non-canon look at Star Trek, that’s why it dropped from 9 million viewers to 2 million in less than a year after it was aired.

The Star Trek movie will suck, how many times must we beat the alternate timeline/time travel dead horse? i guess once more cause JJ is hitting it hard, JJ may be a good director but one thing he is not is a Star Trek fan and he’s admitted to it many times…he is however a Star Wars fan, and this is what it’ll be Star Trek in a Star Wars universe…hopefully the new crew of the unecessarly re-arranged Enterprise will be able to find that thermal exhaust port quickly.

Star Trek 90210 is for posers and the You Tube generation, enjoy.

By: Icarus

Icarus — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:24:28 +0000

CLOVERFIELD is shit!!!!!

By: Vincent Rhodes

Vincent Rhodes — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:51:02 +0000

You,Momo,maybe the worst fan ever.This is Wil Wheaton,who must be a fellow fan talking.Remember he is not Welsey Crusher,infact Crusher is a fictional character.This is just Wheaton giving his opinion,which I have to agree with.Kes was the worst character ever.What was her point of being anyways? For people that say that Enterprise was terrible,you’re all idiots.”Oh this and that arent canon” You know Trekkies pointing out every mistake in the timeline ruined the show.Do you want something just to appeal to Trekkies or something thats good? Now I do have to agree that if this new movies is essentially a reboot than I will hate it.I dont want somebody telling me that 40 years of what I know to be Star Trek is out the window,if thats the case than fuck JJ Abrams.By the way Lost sucks and so did Cloverfield and Alias and most of what Abrams produces…

By: momo

momo — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:57:25 +0000

He was the worst part of the entire Star Trek universe. His opinion is about as worthy as a saggy old prostitute moaning about slack fanny. The bloke is a turd.

By: connor yale96

connor *yale96* — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:34:02 +0000

potentially the worst?!
mate, he was on the ok side of things but definintley not the worst

By: KC

KC — Mon, 12 May 2008 01:46:42 +0000

“Captain Crusher’s Revenge” — yeah that would be something, wouldn’t it?

By: yaz

yaz — Sun, 11 May 2008 15:08:49 +0000

it is a bit rich for someone who played potentially the worst trek character ever to come out with a comment like that! He didn’t even act well with what he was given by the writers!! I know it was cheesy 80′s camp but this guy was just an embarrassment.
J.J Abrams is a sick director, hello! LOST!! CLOVERFIELD!!

when this Crusher twat produces a DECENT body of work THEN he can comment!

By: Jonny

Jonny — Fri, 09 May 2008 22:34:20 +0000

Wow, that is really impressive for someone like to that to come and completely be honest and saying that the people that are managing Star trek’s future are jackasses. Enterprise sucked, this seems like more of the same this film, showing yet again that the writters just dont get it!

Comments on: Ensign Crusher (Wil Wheaton) Thinks Star Trek XI will SUCK

By: D. Phillips

By: Assunta

By: Ene

By: eber3

By: Tom Baker

By: eber3

By: Vader Trek

By: James Spock

By: Stan

By: trekhaus

By: Dj Bombero

By: Pete Sikorsky

By: Pete Sikorsky

By: Fred M

By: Bo

By: Upset nerd

By: MAD TREK EEE

By: David

By: KevinQC

By: Friedebarth

By: Tom

By: Will Killyou

By: Averre

By: Icarus

By: Vincent Rhodes

By: momo

By: connor *yale96*

By: KC

By: yaz

By: Jonny

By: connor yale96