<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terminator Sarah Connor Chronicles &#8211; pilot part 1 (review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/</link>
	<description>star trek, star wars, stargate, bg / books/tv/movies/myths/truth it's all in here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Handwerk</title>
		<link>http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/comment-page-1/#comment-38317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Handwerk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/#comment-38317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really wanted to write a simple message so as to thank you for these fabulous solutions you are placing at this site. My prolonged internet investigation has finally been honored with excellent facts and strategies to write about with my colleagues. I would repeat that we readers are extremely endowed to exist in a good site with  many outstanding people with very helpful solutions. I feel rather fortunate to have encountered the website and look forward to really more brilliant minutes reading here. Thanks a lot once more for all the details.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wanted to write a simple message so as to thank you for these fabulous solutions you are placing at this site. My prolonged internet investigation has finally been honored with excellent facts and strategies to write about with my colleagues. I would repeat that we readers are extremely endowed to exist in a good site with  many outstanding people with very helpful solutions. I feel rather fortunate to have encountered the website and look forward to really more brilliant minutes reading here. Thanks a lot once more for all the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicko</title>
		<link>http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/comment-page-1/#comment-13613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nicko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/#comment-13613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how about you make a show for them and sell it? huh? where&#039;s your bright idea? the fact that it is unoriginal only becomes a problem when the core idea becomes exponentially worsened with each try. this series appears to be a step in the right direction, not to mention that the press is eating it up right now- go google news it. i don&#039;t see what the problem is.. shakespeare has been done to death, but remains the greatest literary achievement that man has ever created, does that mean that the concepts are tired? or that we should move on?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about you make a show for them and sell it? huh? where&#8217;s your bright idea? the fact that it is unoriginal only becomes a problem when the core idea becomes exponentially worsened with each try. this series appears to be a step in the right direction, not to mention that the press is eating it up right now- go google news it. i don&#8217;t see what the problem is.. shakespeare has been done to death, but remains the greatest literary achievement that man has ever created, does that mean that the concepts are tired? or that we should move on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Burns</title>
		<link>http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/comment-page-1/#comment-13610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cliff Burns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/#comment-13610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It isn&#039;t Shakespeare&quot; but at the same time sharecropping franchises plays to that lowest of all common denominators, a pre-existing audience who don&#039;t want their expectations disappointed. Good movies (or television) should boast intelligent, literate writing but even more than that how about some ORIGINALITY?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It isn&#8217;t Shakespeare&#8221; but at the same time sharecropping franchises plays to that lowest of all common denominators, a pre-existing audience who don&#8217;t want their expectations disappointed. Good movies (or television) should boast intelligent, literate writing but even more than that how about some ORIGINALITY?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicko</title>
		<link>http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/comment-page-1/#comment-13599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nicko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/#comment-13599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the smiley should be &quot;eight)&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the smiley should be &#8220;eight)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicko</title>
		<link>http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/comment-page-1/#comment-13598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nicko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/#comment-13598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just watched it on tivo and loved it. it was gripping and fully entertaining without the lag that terrible sci-fi&#039;s have. some critics i&#039;ve read are slandering it without, as i believe, fully understanding the point of the genre whatsoever. this isn&#039;t shakespeare, but it isn&#039;t the series crafted after the total recall movie either. 

i liked the acting, the potential girlfriend turned robot (the truck scene made me almost spike my remote), the forward time travel, and the wondering as to where this series will take me. We&#039;ll see where it does, but I for one (being a kid who&#039;s dad took me to the second film when I was 8) am stoked for the next episode- enough so that I will tolerate having my television tuned to the FUX channel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched it on tivo and loved it. it was gripping and fully entertaining without the lag that terrible sci-fi&#8217;s have. some critics i&#8217;ve read are slandering it without, as i believe, fully understanding the point of the genre whatsoever. this isn&#8217;t shakespeare, but it isn&#8217;t the series crafted after the total recall movie either. </p>
<p>i liked the acting, the potential girlfriend turned robot (the truck scene made me almost spike my remote), the forward time travel, and the wondering as to where this series will take me. We&#8217;ll see where it does, but I for one (being a kid who&#8217;s dad took me to the second film when I was 8) am stoked for the next episode- enough so that I will tolerate having my television tuned to the FUX channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Burns</title>
		<link>http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/comment-page-1/#comment-13594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cliff Burns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmescifi.com/2008/01/13/terminator-sarah-connor-chronicles-pilot-part-1-review/#comment-13594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I...don&#039;t...know...

Sharecropping an existing franchise, rather than coming up with a new concept goes against everything I believe in.  Why is everything in film and TV so derivative? I read an article in a movie magazine that showed the major sources of ideas for films in 1997 and a decade later in 2007.  The movies 10 years ago were built around TV show adaptations and today it&#039;s--ta da!--comic books.  Is that an improvement, do you think? Or trading one type of stupidity for another...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8230;don&#8217;t&#8230;know&#8230;</p>
<p>Sharecropping an existing franchise, rather than coming up with a new concept goes against everything I believe in.  Why is everything in film and TV so derivative? I read an article in a movie magazine that showed the major sources of ideas for films in 1997 and a decade later in 2007.  The movies 10 years ago were built around TV show adaptations and today it&#8217;s&#8211;ta da!&#8211;comic books.  Is that an improvement, do you think? Or trading one type of stupidity for another&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

