Comments on: Sandworms of Dune – Review

By: Pocketbooks

Pocketbooks — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:25:13 +0000

sup, im seriously impressed with your site but i cant click on the other links. You might wanna check your site in safari cuz you know that browser is prone to errors sometimes.

By: Maurice

Maurice — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:20:16 +0000

I totally agree.
These are soulless stories.
In fact… I really like them till “god emperor”.
Heretics and chapter house are good books though, and far better than these crappy ones.
Tolkien Jr. sucks as well

By: Omphalos

Omphalos — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:10:23 +0000

These books are trash. There is no “flow” because every time these idiots dictate a passage they throw rocks into the stream FH created. The only thing that there is, is action. Thoughtless, mindless, pointless action. You might as well read the directions on a bottle of shampoo, because they “flow” identically to this trash.

By: Carl

Carl — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:48:54 +0000

This book is a shame… just a shame.
No depth, no real dialogues, no philosophical undertone…
The son clearly doesn’t have the talent of his father, and he should have done what Christopher Tolikien did with his dad’s legacy…

By: Erocka

Erocka — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:53:15 +0000

I am relieved to see that I am not the only one severly dissapointed by these books. I have yet to finish Sandworms, but I feel as though the formulatic writing and clean full circle narrative will continue on through this book. I felt dirty after I read “Hunters”. I have never had such an overwhelming desire to destroy a book before. For me the Dune journey ended with “Chapter House”

By: showmescifi

showmescifi — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:39:23 +0000

Looks we all know Kevin Anderson is a hack that writes pulp scifi. But it’s clean in terms of language, flow betwen characters and scene and it does ‘read’ well.

By: SandChigger

SandChigger — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:53:35 +0000

I just have to ask…by what criteria do you judge it “a very well written book”?